When you are sick and need to take a day off work, the last
thing you feel like doing is waiting in a doctor’s drop-in practice for hours
to get a medical certificate for your boss. In this blog post I explain the
situations when your employer can lawfully request evidence such as a medical
certificate and the type of evidence which will satisfy the requirement.
Personal leave - basic principles
The material in this blog post is only
relevant to national system employees to which the Fair Work Act 2009 (Fair
Work Act) applies. The term used for sick leave in the Fair Work Act is
“personal leave”. A full time employee is entitled to 10 days of paid
personal/carer’s leave for each year of service (s.96 Fair Work Act). Personal
leave accrues progressively during a year of service according to the
employee’s ordinary hours of work and accumulates from year to year. Part time
employees have the same pro rata entitlement. Employers cannot contravene a
National Employment Standard and are subject to the Fair Work Act’s civil
penalty regime if a contravention does occur (s.44). Accrued personal leave
will not be cashed out unless an award or enterprise agreement applying to the
employee permits cashing out (s.100).
A modern award or enterprise agreement
cannot exclude a National Employment Standard such as the entitlement to
personal leave in s.96 of the Fair Work Act. However, modern awards and
enterprise agreements may contain certain additional clauses relating to
personal leave including terms relating to the kind of evidence an employee
must provide to be entitled to paid personal leave (s.107(5)). An employee to
whom a modern award or enterprise agreement applies must therefore check the
provisions of the relevant instrument to see whether more detailed evidence
requirements apply than the basic requirements contained in s.107.
Evidentiary requirements
Section 107 of the Fair Work Act
provides the notice and evidence requirements for personal leave. After the
employee provides notice of the personal leave to the employer, the employee
must, if required by the employer, give the employer evidence that would
satisfy a reasonable person that the leave is taken “because
the employee is not fit for work because of a personal illness, or personal
injury, affecting the employee” (s.107 and s.97). Two questions arise:
1.
When can an employer request evidence?
2.
What type of evidence would satisfy a reasonable person?
When can an employer request evidence?
The words used in s.107 are “must, if required by the
employer”. This appears to provide employers with broad power to request
medical evidence. However, employers should consider whether requiring the
medical evidence is reasonable. Situations where it would be reasonable to request
medical evidence include where there is an extended absence, a particular
pattern of absence, or the employer otherwise reasonably suspects the employee
does not satisfy the requirements to take personal leave. Where the employer
makes a request for the evidence, the evidence must be provided within a
reasonable timeframe. A reasonable timeframe could be during the personal leave
(if the personal leave is occurring over a long period of time), or after the
personal leave has finished (if the personal leave is for a short period of
time).
What type of evidence would satisfy a reasonable person?
A reasonable person would be satisfied by medical evidence
such as a medical certificate. Personal leave may be taken where the employee
“is not fit to work because of a personal illness, or personal injury,
affecting the employee” (s.97). Note the “not fit to work” requirement. Having
an illness or injury alone is not sufficient to take personal leave. Where a
medical certificate is not obtained and an employer subsequently requests
evidence, the employee may be able to submit a statutory declaration as
evidence that would satisfy a reasonable person. However, a statutory
declaration may not suffice where a modern award or enterprise agreement has
more specific evidence requirements. A good example is the Telstra Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018.
Clause 32.2(a) provides that
“medical evidence” must be provided to an employee’s manager if personal leave
is more than 3 consecutive work days or if more than 5 personal leave days have
already been taken during the leave year without providing evidence. A
statutory declaration is unlikely to fall within the concept of “medical
evidence”, especially when contrasted to clause 32.2(b) which expressly permits
a statutory declaration be provided where the employer has requested evidence
after forming a reasonable suspicion the employee is not entitled to the
personal leave.
Modern awards and enterprise
agreements may contain more specific provisions relating to personal leave
evidentiary requirements.
Modern awards and enterprise
agreements may contain more specific provisions relating to personal leave
evidentiary requirements. It is therefore important to understand whether you
are covered by a modern award or enterprise agreement. You should be able to
find this information in your employment contract or letter of offer. If in
doubt, you should talk to your employer’s human resources contact or call the
Fair Work Ombudsman for advice.
Enterprise agreements often contain
specific provisions relating to personal leave evidentiary requirements. In
contrast, modern awards generally refer to the personal/carer’s leave in the
National Employment Standards and do not provide additional evidentiary
requirements for personal leave. For example, the Banking, Finance and
Insurance Award 2010 provides “Personal/carer’s leave and compassionate leave
are provided for in the NES”. Some modern awards provide for unpaid personal
leave for casuals, such as the General Retail Industry Award 2010:
33.1
Personal/carer’s leave and compassionate leave are provided for in the NES.
33.2
Casual employees are entitled to be not available for work or to leave work to
care for a person who is sick and requires care and support or who requires
care due to an emergency.
33.3
Such leave is unpaid. A maximum of 48 hours absence is allowed by right with
additional absence by agreement.
Case law on the evidentiary requirements of s.107 is
limited:
1.
Australian and International Pilots Association v Qantas Airways Ltd [2014]
FCA 32
This adverse action case concerned a
pilot First Officer Greg Kiernan who took extended sick leave due to clinical
depression. Mr Kiernan produced medical certificates, but Qantas requested a
more detailed report that outlined his fitness to work in his role as a pilot
and the expected timeframe to resume normal duties. Mr Kiernan argued he had
satisfied this evidentiary requirement by providing the medical certificates
and was not required to produce a more detailed report. The key provisions of
the certified agreement were:
“31.3.7 Notifying the Company of illness
A flight crew member is required to notify the Company immediately upon becoming ill and will, as far as possible, state the nature of the illness and the estimated duration of absence.
...
31.3.10 When a medical certificate is required
(d) Before being required to produce a medical certificate or other evidence of unfitness for duty, a flight crew member is entitled to a maximum of four occasions or seven days of sick leave commencing from 20 August in each year. However, if a flight crew member reports sick on the same day that he or she is contacted for duty or on the following day, the Company may require the flight crew member to produce a medical certificate or other evidence of unfitness for duty.
(e) Any patterns affected by non-certificated sick leave will be unpaid other than as provided in 31.3.10(a).” (emphasis added)
A flight crew member is required to notify the Company immediately upon becoming ill and will, as far as possible, state the nature of the illness and the estimated duration of absence.
...
31.3.10 When a medical certificate is required
(d) Before being required to produce a medical certificate or other evidence of unfitness for duty, a flight crew member is entitled to a maximum of four occasions or seven days of sick leave commencing from 20 August in each year. However, if a flight crew member reports sick on the same day that he or she is contacted for duty or on the following day, the Company may require the flight crew member to produce a medical certificate or other evidence of unfitness for duty.
(e) Any patterns affected by non-certificated sick leave will be unpaid other than as provided in 31.3.10(a).” (emphasis added)
Justice Rares held that the provisions
in the certified agreement were not exhaustive of the contractual rights between
Qantas and its employees in respect of when or why Qantas could require an
employee to undergo a medical examination or provide further information about
the employee’s medical condition. Justice Rares implied a term into the
employment contract that Qantas may require medical evidence of the kind sought
from Mr Kiernan, and require Mr Kiernan to attend a meeting to discuss matters
arising from the certified agreement and the Work Health and Safety Act. The
implied term is necessary to enable the employer to make its own business
arrangements and to adjust for the impact caused by the sickness. Unless there
is an express term to the contrary, ordinarily in a contract of employment,
each party agrees to do all such things as are necessary on their part to
enable the other party to have the benefit of the contract.
While this case did not directly
concern the interpretation of the evidentiary provisions in s.107 of the Fair
Work Act, it is a good example of the many layers of law that can influence
when an employer can request medical evidence.
2. Maritime
Union of Australia v DP World Sydney Limited [2014] FWC 2682
This case involved an employee who provided a backdated
medical certificate as evidence of an illness. The employee was covered by the DP
World Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2011 which included both a
personal leave clause (cl.16) and an absence management clause (Appendix 1).
The absence management clause provided:
DP World understands that from time to time, Employees are
unable to attend work due to illness or injury. In these circumstances,
Employees have the right to access their sick leave entitlement provided for
under the Agreement provided this is for genuine illness. Employees should be
aware however of the impact unplanned absences have on the business and the
Company's ability to properly service its customers. For these reasons and to
ensure sick leave is used for genuine illness or injury the Company
requires Employees to provide the following evidence to substantiate their absences
in any of the following circumstances:
(a) 5 days absence in the year may be uncertified;
(b) The 6th uncertified day of absence requires production
of a statutory declaration;
(c) Any absence in excess of 6 uncertified days must be
accompanied by a medical certificate;
(d) Sick leave absences for each day prior to or following a
public holiday must be accompanied by a medical certificate;
(e) Employees who are subject to an Absence Management Plan
(AMP) must provide a medical certificate for any absence:
In the cases where medical certificates must be provided as
outlined, the certificates will only be accepted in the following
circumstances:
(a) Prior to the day of the absence;
(b) On the day of the absence;
(c) On the next rostered shift immediately following the
absence (provided certificate is not backdated).
In all these circumstances no backdated medical certificates
will be accepted.” [Emphasis added]
Commissioner Cambridge held that a backdated medical
certificate certifies illness in respect to a period before the date the
medical practitioner examined the person and made the certificate. Appendix 1
of the enterprise agreement needed to be reconciled with s.107 of the Fair Work
Act which provides any evidence that would satisfy a reasonable person can be
provided as evidence of the personal leave. Unilaterally rejecting a backdated
medical certificate that deprives an employee of their personal leave entitlements
will breach s.107 of the Fair Work Act. This case highlights the risks
associated with focusing solely on the provisions of an enterprise agreement in
determining employee leave entitlements. Enterprise agreements must be read
subject to the sections of the Fair Work Act.
3.
Vos Construction and Joinery Pty Ltd re Vos Construction
& Joinery Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Construction North) 2013-2016
[2013] FWC 4009
A proposed enterprise agreement
contained a notice clause requiring more onerous notice requirements than
contained in s.107 when an employee takes personal leave. Commissioner Ryan
reiterated that whilst s.107(5) permits enterprise agreements to include terms
relating to the kind of evidence an employee must provide to an employer there
is no provision in s.107 for enterprise agreements to contain a term with more
onerous notice requirements than provided for in s.107(2) of the Fair Work Act.
4.
Trustee for the MTGI Trust v Johnston [2016] FCAFC 140
Mr Johnston took annual leave when his
wife had an emergency caesarean and his fourth child was born ten weeks
premature. He later sought to transfer that leave to personal leave. This lead
to his dismissal by his employer. The Full Court of the Federal Court upheld
the unfair dismissal decision.
Conclusions
1.
Employees
·
You are only entitled to take personal leave under s.97 of the Fair Work Act
where an illness or injury means you are not fit to work. Personal leave cannot
be used for other reasons. If you need to care for a family member, you may be
able to take carer’s leave in accordance with s.97(b) of the Fair Work Act.
·
Familiarize yourself with the evidentiary requirements of the enterprise
agreement or award that covers you so you know in advance whether you will need
to obtain medical evidence.
·
If you are unsure call human resources at your work and
find out what their expectations are. While their expectations may or may not
be the correct legal interpretation of the enterprise agreement or award, it is
in your best interests to obtain the medical evidence and dispute the
requirement later if you wish. You can also call the Fair Work Ombudsman for
advice.
·
Keep track of days you take leave without medical evidence. This is
particularly important if the enterprise agreement provides that medical
evidence must be given after a certain amount of days of personal leave have
been taken. Your employer must provide information about the number of days of
personal leave you have taken within a reasonable time on request (see s.536
Fair Work Act and reg.3.36 Fair Work Regulations 2009).
2.
Employers
·
It may not be reasonable to request medical evidence for personal leave in all
situations.
·
Ensure you are familiar with the personal leave provisions in any enterprise
agreements or modern awards relating to your employees. In particular, the
provisions in an enterprise agreement or modern award must be read in
conjunction with the Fair Work Act and the contract of employment.
·
Ensure records are kept of personal leave taken by employees and respond to
employee requests for personal leave records in a reasonable time frame.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this information. Your blog is very informational.Our expertise is in all areas of Criminal Law (including everything from assault, apprehended violence orders, drink driving & drug driving, traffic offences, computer crime through to drug importation and murder trials) and we have a high profile within the Criminal Law area.Sydney Criminal Lawyers
ReplyDelete